Monthly Archives: January 2013

It has become almost conventional wisdom within the Duke community that Rasheed Sulaimon is a “better fit” for Duke than Austin Rivers. Obviously there is some disappointment from last year’s team that started off well, beat UNC in one of the greatest games of all time and then become one of only six teams to lose to a 15th seed in the NCAA tournament. A lot of the team’s shortcomings were blamed on Rivers. He seemed like a natural target since he was very highly recruited, the son of an NBA player and overall carried himself as a jerk. There was somewhat of a “over promise / under deliver” aspect that left a bitter taste with Rivers.

Before we get to Sulaimon, lets first look at this year’s Duke team. Nobody will argue this team is playing much better than last year, but if you needed any proof the top 5 returning players (Plumlee, Curry, Kelly, Cook and Thornton) all have better FG%s than last year. Mason Plumlee in particular has gone from a *curse word to possibly the best player in the country. Because of the entire team’s improvement this team has gone undefeated through the nation’s toughest schedule.

*I would often yell Plumlee after a turnover, missed free throw or stupid defensive gamble.I can only assume my wife thought Plumlee was some type of curse word. Really I just thought Mason was Josh McRoberts 2.0 and would never live up to the hype.

So the team is playing much better and has had an amazing start to the season. With that start people have looked for a reason why. Is it because Mason Plumlee worked on his free throw shooting? Is it because Quinn Cook has made huge leap? Is it because Ryan Kelly improved as a defender? All of those are factors, but a lot of people seem to be pointing soley to trading out Sulaimon for Rivers.

The thing is that I don’t disagree that the switch has helped the team. I tolerated Rivers, but love watching Sulaimon play. Give me even 2.5 more years of watching him play and he might reach Nolan Smith/Jon Scheyer/Shane Battier level for me. However, I find it confusing that people automatically point to Sulaimon being a better fit or more of a Duke type player. What about this? Sulaimon is just a better player than Rivers.

Let’s compare.

Sulaimon was the 12th ranked recruit compared to Rivers being 3rd, so while everyone assume Rivers was going to be a NBA level talent, it isn’t like people thought poorly of Sulaimon. And then when you look at actual play you see that Sulaimon has a better FG% (44% to 43%), better FT% (84% to 66%) and better 3PT% (40% to 36%). He also has more rebounds and assists per per game, while averaging almost a turnover less. And if stats aren’t your thing then just watch both of them play and see who you think is a better defender. So yes he is a better fit and this team does have much better chemistry. However, I think it is also clear that Sulaimon is just a much better player than Rivers. That combined with the improvement from everyone else has made this team a legitimate threat to win the national title. Now can we get back to wondering if Jabari Parker is enough of a Duke-type player?

2012: Virginia (Rd. of 64)
2011: FSU (Sweet 16), Alabama (NIT title game)
2010: FSU (Rd. of 64), USC (no postseason)
2009: Washington State (First Round NIT), Stephen F. Austin (Rd. of 64)
2008: None
2007: Illinois (Rd. of 64), UConn (no postseason)
2006: Iowa (Rd. of 64), Washington State (no postseason), Southern Illinois (Rd. of 64)
2005: Washington State (no postseason), Iowa State (Rd. of 32), Minnesota (Rd. of 64)
2004: None
2003: Oklahoma State (Rd. of 32)

16 teams, 1 Sweet 16, 2 round of 32, 7 first round, 4 no postseason, 1 1st round NIT, one NIT title game

It’s 2013, and all the haters who said we couldn’t make it this far are either eating crow, or dead by the hand Mayans. The reunion of the Walk-Ons is finally here, and we’re talking about all the college hoops that happened while we were gone. Kentucky-Louisville? Yep. Minnesota-Michigan State? YES. Cincinnati, Indiana, Cuse, Pitt, Zags, Illini, and a resurgent UCLA??? YOU BETCHA, AMIGO. Good times abound as we cover a lot of personal and professional ground in this hour. Bless your heart for listening, and happy 2013.

 

Got a story you’d like to share or thoughts on Matt’s love life? E-mail us at [email protected]

Follow us on twitter at @WalkOnsPodcast

Or leave a voicemail at our Google Voice #, and we will put you on the show: 818-Walk-On1 (that’s 818-925-5661)

Be a pal and subscribe to the podcast in iTunes. Just click “view in iTunes” once you reach that link, and then ‘subscribe for free.’ Voila. If you’re feeling really generous, you could also rate the podcast and write a positive review.

You can also access our podcast RSS feed.

If you need to download the file directly, this’ll do it. Enjoy!of the

I have documented my complex love-hate-love feelings for Duke in the past, so I’ll forego all that, except for the practical upshot: I really wanted Duke to win the Belk Bowl. As a UNC fan, I know that those Charlotte bowls are fool’s gold. UNC has gone bowling in the Queen City thrice in my lifetime, and I have zero positive memories from any of those outings. Sure, Ric Flair was there once, but in 2004 Boston College’s punter trucked a UNC linebacker for a touchdown on a fake field goal, and UNC lost in Charlotte twice in a row by a combined 3 points during the pitiful doldrums of their Davis-Era mediocrity. So my desire to see a deep blue victory was a combination of my own weird Duke emotions and of my need to see the finest state in the country finally defend itself successfully from an outside threat.[1]

I have just seen Les Misérables, so it’s clouding (or more probably, enhancing) my understanding of the world, and I have come to this conclusion: this year’s Duke team was the Éponine of the ACC. You want what’s best for her in spite of yourself, and she’s way more interesting than Cosette (Florida State? I don’t know. The metaphor kind of falls apart here) but you know how it’s going to end, which is tragic.[2]

In the same way that Éponine is interesting both because of her circumstances and the decisions she makes within the life-parameters that fate has saddled her with, Duke rolled into Charlotte as either a pretty fascinating case study in ACC ascension, or the least-likely flash (such as it is) in the Coastal pan. Either way, much more compelling than Cincinnati’s Cosette: senselessly virtuous and generically pretty in her redundant we-made-it-to-a-bowl-game-chrome helmets. But alas, Duke was to be shot in the chest, and Cincinnati had their victory rescued for them from out of a river of their own crap.

[The only remotely interesting thing about the Bearcats was the name of their backup quarterback, Munchie Legeaux (plus the announcers’ baffling pronunciation of that name, which is French, and seems like it should be phonetically closer to “Let’s go,” than to “leggo my eggo,” right? Although I do love the idea of the Legeaux family as a clan of interlocking Danish blocks)].[3]

But anyway, a few hours, a healthy smattering of various injuries and two goal-line fumbles later, at the end of the game Duke was just another game older, which is all you can say for the life of the poor.

This website’s own benevolent curator has voiced his opinions on the possible fluky-ness of Duke’s “success” under Cutcliffe, and it will remain to be seen if this season was an anomaly or a step forward, but (for whatever reason) I am oddly optimistic. Under Cutcliffe, Duke has had seasons where they won the two-or-so games they should have, and seasons where they pulled of zany upsets (Thaddeus Lewis shredding That One Red Team in 2009 is still one of my absolute favorite things that has ever happened in the ACC) but when was the last time they did both in the same year?            Next year, Duke can replace Florida State and Clemson (really the ACC’s only reliably semi-elite teams) on their schedule with, say, Boston College and NIU-Hillsborough Street, and their non-conference schedule is comprised of Memphis, Navy, and N.C. Central. Wake Forest and Virginia are also on the schedule, plus Georgia Tech (possibly after Navy, and that triple-option is way less pesky when you’re seeing it for the second time in a season). It’s not super delusional to see five or six winnable games in there.[4]

The instant it seemed possible, Duke’s season became about reaching the bowl game, but never winning it. The team used up everything in achieving that sixth win, and then fell to the season’s final onslaught, behind a bunker made of furniture. The Duke team’s presence alone in Charlotte was a validation of those lofty (by uniquely Durham standards) expectations, and they just didn’t have the stuff to exceed them.

Next year, the Blue Devils won’t have the luxury of lowered expectations, but if they can eke out six wins and go bowling two seasons in a row, then the narrative that the announcers touched on Thursday is going to be the one I choose to believe: that Cutcliffe has been re-invigorated by Peyton Manning[5], and Duke football has become some new kind of Duke football, and is no longer singing, sadly and alone, out in the cold, French rain.