The Walk-Ons: Cakes, Brackets, and Bachelor References

We’re walking a little bit on the wild side this Tuesday afternoon, with talk about arsenic-laced birthday cake, twitter fiascos, everything the media won’t tell you about Miss Alabama, and even a little bit of basketball. Matt won’t stop referencing “The Bachelor,” his favorite show, while Ben thinks UNC is a fraud and Shane got his twitter name on an ESPN broadcast under false pretenses. Are Duke and Michigan elite teams in comparison to the rest of college basketall? Was this past week in basketball exciting or dull? Can UCLA win the Pac-12? Are Kentucky and Florida the two most underrated teams at the moment? What will the three-man brain trust say about the surprising ascent of Kansas State? All this and more, including the exciting race between Matt and Jay Bilas for basketball commissioner.

 

Got a story you’d like to share or thoughts on Matt’s love life? E-mail us at [email protected]

Follow us on twitter at @WalkOnsPodcast

Or leave a voicemail at our Google Voice #, and we will put you on the show: 818-Walk-On1 (that’s 818-925-5661)

Be a pal and subscribe to the podcast in iTunes. Just click “view in iTunes” once you reach that link, and then ‘subscribe for free.’ Voila. If you’re feeling really generous, you could also rate the podcast and write a positive review.

You can also access our podcast RSS feed.

If you need to download the file directly, this’ll do it. Enjoy!

Posted in Miscellaneous | 3 Comments

Is Rasheed Sulaimon too much, too little or just enough of a Duke-type player?

It has become almost conventional wisdom within the Duke community that Rasheed Sulaimon is a “better fit” for Duke than Austin Rivers. Obviously there is some disappointment from last year’s team that started off well, beat UNC in one of the greatest games of all time and then become one of only six teams to lose to a 15th seed in the NCAA tournament. A lot of the team’s shortcomings were blamed on Rivers. He seemed like a natural target since he was very highly recruited, the son of an NBA player and overall carried himself as a jerk. There was somewhat of a “over promise / under deliver” aspect that left a bitter taste with Rivers.

Before we get to Sulaimon, lets first look at this year’s Duke team. Nobody will argue this team is playing much better than last year, but if you needed any proof the top 5 returning players (Plumlee, Curry, Kelly, Cook and Thornton) all have better FG%s than last year. Mason Plumlee in particular has gone from a *curse word to possibly the best player in the country. Because of the entire team’s improvement this team has gone undefeated through the nation’s toughest schedule.

*I would often yell Plumlee after a turnover, missed free throw or stupid defensive gamble.I can only assume my wife thought Plumlee was some type of curse word. Really I just thought Mason was Josh McRoberts 2.0 and would never live up to the hype.

So the team is playing much better and has had an amazing start to the season. With that start people have looked for a reason why. Is it because Mason Plumlee worked on his free throw shooting? Is it because Quinn Cook has made huge leap? Is it because Ryan Kelly improved as a defender? All of those are factors, but a lot of people seem to be pointing soley to trading out Sulaimon for Rivers.

The thing is that I don’t disagree that the switch has helped the team. I tolerated Rivers, but love watching Sulaimon play. Give me even 2.5 more years of watching him play and he might reach Nolan Smith/Jon Scheyer/Shane Battier level for me. However, I find it confusing that people automatically point to Sulaimon being a better fit or more of a Duke type player. What about this? Sulaimon is just a better player than Rivers.

Let’s compare.

Sulaimon was the 12th ranked recruit compared to Rivers being 3rd, so while everyone assume Rivers was going to be a NBA level talent, it isn’t like people thought poorly of Sulaimon. And then when you look at actual play you see that Sulaimon has a better FG% (44% to 43%), better FT% (84% to 66%) and better 3PT% (40% to 36%). He also has more rebounds and assists per per game, while averaging almost a turnover less. And if stats aren’t your thing then just watch both of them play and see who you think is a better defender. So yes he is a better fit and this team does have much better chemistry. However, I think it is also clear that Sulaimon is just a much better player than Rivers. That combined with the improvement from everyone else has made this team a legitimate threat to win the national title. Now can we get back to wondering if Jabari Parker is enough of a Duke-type player?

Posted in Miscellaneous | Leave a comment

Tester

2012: Virginia (Rd. of 64)
2011: FSU (Sweet 16), Alabama (NIT title game)
2010: FSU (Rd. of 64), USC (no postseason)
2009: Washington State (First Round NIT), Stephen F. Austin (Rd. of 64)
2008: None
2007: Illinois (Rd. of 64), UConn (no postseason)
2006: Iowa (Rd. of 64), Washington State (no postseason), Southern Illinois (Rd. of 64)
2005: Washington State (no postseason), Iowa State (Rd. of 32), Minnesota (Rd. of 64)
2004: None
2003: Oklahoma State (Rd. of 32)

16 teams, 1 Sweet 16, 2 round of 32, 7 first round, 4 no postseason, 1 1st round NIT, one NIT title game

Posted in Miscellaneous | Leave a comment

The Walk-Ons: 2013, Baby!

It’s 2013, and all the haters who said we couldn’t make it this far are either eating crow, or dead by the hand Mayans. The reunion of the Walk-Ons is finally here, and we’re talking about all the college hoops that happened while we were gone. Kentucky-Louisville? Yep. Minnesota-Michigan State? YES. Cincinnati, Indiana, Cuse, Pitt, Zags, Illini, and a resurgent UCLA??? YOU BETCHA, AMIGO. Good times abound as we cover a lot of personal and professional ground in this hour. Bless your heart for listening, and happy 2013.

 

Got a story you’d like to share or thoughts on Matt’s love life? E-mail us at [email protected]

Follow us on twitter at @WalkOnsPodcast

Or leave a voicemail at our Google Voice #, and we will put you on the show: 818-Walk-On1 (that’s 818-925-5661)

Be a pal and subscribe to the podcast in iTunes. Just click “view in iTunes” once you reach that link, and then ‘subscribe for free.’ Voila. If you’re feeling really generous, you could also rate the podcast and write a positive review.

You can also access our podcast RSS feed.

If you need to download the file directly, this’ll do it. Enjoy!of the

Posted in Miscellaneous | Leave a comment

Belk Bowl: Anatomy of a Heartbreak

I have documented my complex love-hate-love feelings for Duke in the past, so I’ll forego all that, except for the practical upshot: I really wanted Duke to win the Belk Bowl. As a UNC fan, I know that those Charlotte bowls are fool’s gold. UNC has gone bowling in the Queen City thrice in my lifetime, and I have zero positive memories from any of those outings. Sure, Ric Flair was there once, but in 2004 Boston College’s punter trucked a UNC linebacker for a touchdown on a fake field goal, and UNC lost in Charlotte twice in a row by a combined 3 points during the pitiful doldrums of their Davis-Era mediocrity. So my desire to see a deep blue victory was a combination of my own weird Duke emotions and of my need to see the finest state in the country finally defend itself successfully from an outside threat.[1]

I have just seen Les Misérables, so it’s clouding (or more probably, enhancing) my understanding of the world, and I have come to this conclusion: this year’s Duke team was the Éponine of the ACC. You want what’s best for her in spite of yourself, and she’s way more interesting than Cosette (Florida State? I don’t know. The metaphor kind of falls apart here) but you know how it’s going to end, which is tragic.[2]

In the same way that Éponine is interesting both because of her circumstances and the decisions she makes within the life-parameters that fate has saddled her with, Duke rolled into Charlotte as either a pretty fascinating case study in ACC ascension, or the least-likely flash (such as it is) in the Coastal pan. Either way, much more compelling than Cincinnati’s Cosette: senselessly virtuous and generically pretty in her redundant we-made-it-to-a-bowl-game-chrome helmets. But alas, Duke was to be shot in the chest, and Cincinnati had their victory rescued for them from out of a river of their own crap.

[The only remotely interesting thing about the Bearcats was the name of their backup quarterback, Munchie Legeaux (plus the announcers’ baffling pronunciation of that name, which is French, and seems like it should be phonetically closer to “Let’s go,” than to “leggo my eggo,” right? Although I do love the idea of the Legeaux family as a clan of interlocking Danish blocks)].[3]

But anyway, a few hours, a healthy smattering of various injuries and two goal-line fumbles later, at the end of the game Duke was just another game older, which is all you can say for the life of the poor.

This website’s own benevolent curator has voiced his opinions on the possible fluky-ness of Duke’s “success” under Cutcliffe, and it will remain to be seen if this season was an anomaly or a step forward, but (for whatever reason) I am oddly optimistic. Under Cutcliffe, Duke has had seasons where they won the two-or-so games they should have, and seasons where they pulled of zany upsets (Thaddeus Lewis shredding That One Red Team in 2009 is still one of my absolute favorite things that has ever happened in the ACC) but when was the last time they did both in the same year?            Next year, Duke can replace Florida State and Clemson (really the ACC’s only reliably semi-elite teams) on their schedule with, say, Boston College and NIU-Hillsborough Street, and their non-conference schedule is comprised of Memphis, Navy, and N.C. Central. Wake Forest and Virginia are also on the schedule, plus Georgia Tech (possibly after Navy, and that triple-option is way less pesky when you’re seeing it for the second time in a season). It’s not super delusional to see five or six winnable games in there.[4]

The instant it seemed possible, Duke’s season became about reaching the bowl game, but never winning it. The team used up everything in achieving that sixth win, and then fell to the season’s final onslaught, behind a bunker made of furniture. The Duke team’s presence alone in Charlotte was a validation of those lofty (by uniquely Durham standards) expectations, and they just didn’t have the stuff to exceed them.

Next year, the Blue Devils won’t have the luxury of lowered expectations, but if they can eke out six wins and go bowling two seasons in a row, then the narrative that the announcers touched on Thursday is going to be the one I choose to believe: that Cutcliffe has been re-invigorated by Peyton Manning[5], and Duke football has become some new kind of Duke football, and is no longer singing, sadly and alone, out in the cold, French rain.

 


[1]I know State’s won there twice, but this isn’t the part of the Internet where we care about State.

[2] Incidentally, one of my friends went to a production in Atlanta where Eponine was cut from the play entirely. Isn’t that the most Meta thing you’ve ever heard?

 [3]  An aside: here are a couple of Duke player nicknames I came up with. Need for Snead: Underground, New England Clam Crowder. Also, Connete-Four, but the credit goes to my brother.

 [4] Hope, it should be pointed out, is cruel, probably.

 [5] The uncertain coach has his love of the game re-kindled when one of the greatest players of all time trusts him with a vital part of that player’s journey back from an injury that should have been career-ending. The uncertain coach, with new fire, wrings every drop of the stuff that wins football games out of his players, etc. etc. That’s a beautiful story no matter which shade of blue you prefer.

Posted in Miscellaneous | 1 Comment

5 Classes for Duke Fans During the Winter Break

As usual, the end of the calendar year means that Duke’s schedule slows down so that the players can take fulfilling the ‘student’ part of their ‘student-athlete’ status. Rather than pass the time with NBA games featuring millionaires playing lazy defense, why not pretend to study something just like your favorite college athletes (who are also only pretending to study)?

So here are five subjects Duke fans should study during the end of semester break (by the way, you can probably get actual college credit for these if you play football at UNC).

History

Watching Mason Plumlee dominate the paint while shooters like Seth Curry, Rasheed Sulaimon and Ryan Kelly bury threes feels somewhat familiar doesn’t it? Well the best way to understand the present is to learn your history. And a scholarly look back at Duke’s 2010 Championship team shows some startling similarities to the current crop of Blue Devils.

Ryan Kelly is a big man who likes to drift away from the paint to take outside shots, not unlike Kyle Singler. Seth Curry is a senior dead eye shooter more or less playing the Jon Scheyer role. Meanwhile, Mason Plumlee is dominating the paint the way Brian Zoubek did during Duke’s Championship run.

True, the comparisons aren’t perfect. Kyle Singler stood in the small forward spot while Ryan Kelly is playing power forward. Jon Scheyer was probably a better shooter and all around scorer than Seth Curry. And while Brian Zoubek wasn’t as good a player as Mason Plumlee, Zoubek was better at swiping offensive rebounds.

Of course history doesn’t so much as repeat itself as it provides interesting insight into understanding the present.

The 2010 team held an average per-game rebounding edge over opponents of 6.2 while through nine games this Duke team has a per-game rebounding edge is -1 (via DBR). Can Duke win without a Lance Thomas style role player to rebound alongside Mason Plumlee?

The 2010 team had Nolan Smith scoring from the point guard position. Does the combination of Quinn Cook and Rasheed Sulaimon equal the contributions of Nolan Smith?

The two teams are similar, but there are some key differences that might shine a light on just how far this Duke team can go. So the question remains: what, if anything, can Duke learn from its history.

Religious Iconography

In Duke lore there is nothing more religiously iconic than a retired jersey. Mason Plumlee is making a case for Player of the Year, so it’s worth wondering if the middle brother might find his number dangling from the Cameron Indoor rafters along with the other Sainted players.

The best measuring stick for Plumlee’s worthiness of highest praise is to compare him to another sacred center/forward, Sheldon Williams.

Sheldon Williams never won a Player of the Year, though his teammate J.J. Redick did, but Williams did earn Defensive Player of the Year twice. “The Landlord” also has better career stats than Mason Plumlee.

Sheldon Williams’ career stats at Duke are 13.9 points-per-game and 9.1 rebounds-per-game. During his junior and senior years, Williams averaged a double-double for the season (via GoDuke).

Until this year, Mason Plumlee’s junior season was his best statistical year as he averaged 11.1 points. Sheldon Williams only averaged lower than Plumlee’s 11.1 as a freshman. As a sophomore “The Landlord” averaged 12.6 points and improved on that total as a junior and senior.

That being said, Sheldon Williams never won a National Championship whereas Mason Plumlee was a part of the 2010 Title team. True, Plumlee was a freshman on that squad and only played 14.1 minutes-per-game, but he still got a ring (via GoDuke).

The point is, if Mason Plumlee lands Player of the Year honors or delivers an NCAA Championship, the second in his four years at Duke, then hanging his jersey in Cameron next to Sheldon Williams’ for everyone to idolize might be something to consider.

Chemistry

This holiday season you’re bound to run into a UNC fan who will insist that the ole Roy’s boys have much better depth than Duke. This UNC fan will probably point to Coach Williams’ propensity to use an 11 man rotation and the fact that Duke has almost no bench points.

This is when lessons learned from a chemistry class come in handy.

Bench points is the most worthless stat in basketball and the refuge of desperate fans looking to clutch to any straw that might save them from drowning. Points are points. Whether they come from a starter or a bench player, they all go up on the scoreboard the same.

Duke doesn’t ask anyone off the bench to score because they don’t need offense off the bench. All of Duke’s starters are averaging double-digit points. On the whole, Duke’s starting five averages a total of 71.6 points-per-game (via ESPN).

So Duke is getting plenty of offense. What the Blue Devils need is defense and rebounding from its bench players.

Tyler Thornton has picked up 18 steals so far while Amile Jefferson and Josh Hairston are filling in admirably when they spell either Mason Plumlee or Ryan Kelly.

The bottom line is that everyone on the Blue Devils has a clearly defined role. That may not improve the draft value of the players as individuals, but it does ensure that Duke goes into games with a strong mixture of players contributing in a bunch of different ways.

Teams centered around a single star (like Austin Rivers) tend to fizzle out in terms of team chemistry. This Duke team, however, has bonded at a subatomic level and that makes them a tough team for opponents to break down.

Pre-Med

Seth Curry has been battling a leg injury since before the season started. So far Curry has been able to play well, averaging 16.1 points-per-game. However, there have been times when he has looked to be limited in terms of mobility and when he rolled his ankle against Ohio State that certainly didn’t help matters.

Duke can beat cupcakes like Delaware without Curry, but depth isn’t this Duke squad’s strongest point. If Curry can’t play, then Duke will most certainly struggle against conference foes and in tournament settings.

In fact, over the course of the Battle 4 Atlantis Tournament, where Duke played three games in three days, Seth Curry’s stats go progressively worse. He scored 25 points against Minnesota, 15 against VCU and 14 against Louisville (via ESPN).

Maybe that was due to increasingly stronger opponents, or maybe it was evidence that Curry can’t handle that much wear and tear in a short time frame. Either way, the rigors of conference play will certainly test Curry’s health.

If Seth Curry can’t go, Tyler Thornton takes his spot in the lineup. While Thornton offers a better defensive option than Curry, the amount of offense lost in Curry’s absence might be too much for Duke to overcome.

Therefore, it’s imperative that Curry make it through the season in good enough shape to be able to contribute to ACC and NCAA tournament runs.

Armchair diagnostics will also come in handy when Marshall Plumlee returns from his injury. MP3 will probably get worked into the lineup slowly so as to not upset the team chemistry, but his height adds a much needed backup center to Duke’s bench options.

Cryptozoology

What is Cryptozoologoy? It’s the study of animals that may or may not exist. That includes things like Bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster and Alex Murphy.

When he arrived at Duke two years ago, Alex Murphy was purported to be a new incarnation of Kyle Singler. The fact that Murphy redshirted last year only helped to heighten the mystery around whether or not this rumored Kyle Singler 2.0 was real or just a myth.

Through nine games Alex Murphy has appeared just seven times and played a total of 40 minutes. The Chupacabra shows up with more regularity than that. And like the Chupacabra, Alex Murphy has done quite a bit of sucking when he’s on the court.

Until the Delaware game, Murphy was 0-3 from the floor and looked lost in the offense. Currently, the only Blue Devil with a worse field goal percentage than Murphy is Tyler Thornton (via ESPN).

That being said, in the game against Delaware Murphy came off the bench to play 21 minutes and scored 10 points. For the first time all season he showed signs of the rumored Singler sub-species. With a few more cupcake opponents, Alex Muphy will have more chances to prove whether or not he’s the real deal or just a mirage produced by swamp gas, shadows on the water or an elaborate hoax.

Posted in Duke | 1 Comment

Walk-Ons: Big East Imminent Collapse Blues

Today we’re talking about the perils of the Big East, looking forward to the weekend, and exposing my total ignorance of important rock music. Also, what’s the deal with other people named Matt Jones, Ben Swain, and Shane Ryan? Why are they on the Internet? Get those fools outta here.

 

Got a story you’d like to share or thoughts on Matt’s love life? E-mail us at [email protected]

Follow us on twitter at @WalkOnsPodcast

Or leave a voicemail at our Google Voice #, and we may even put you on the show: 818-Walk-On1 (that’s 818-925-5661)

Be a pal and subscribe to the podcast in iTunes. Just click “view in iTunes” once you reach that link, and then ‘subscribe for free.’ Voila. If you’re feeling really generous, you could also rate the podcast and write a positive review.

You can also access our podcast RSS feed.

If you need to download the file directly, this’ll do it. Enjoy!

Posted in Miscellaneous | 3 Comments

Walk-Ons: Brandon Paul’s heroics and the rest of the weekend action

Crazy girls, neutral court games, endorsing Kentucky watches, and the weekend in basketball are all discussed in this episode. What did the mechanical frog say? Rivet, rivet. Or Robot, robot.

 

Got a great Psycho T story or a Bleacher Report quote or any other thoughts? E-mail us at [email protected]

Follow us on twitter at @WalkOnsPodcast

Or leave a voicemail at our Google Voice #, and you will almost surely get to be on the show: 818-Walk-On1 (that’s 818-925-5661)

Be a pal and subscribe to the podcast in iTunes. Just click “view in iTunes” once you reach that link, and then ‘subscribe for free.’ Voila. If you’re feeling really generous, you could also rate the podcast and write a positive review.

You can also access our podcast RSS feed.

If you need to download the file directly, this’ll do it. Enjoy!

Posted in Miscellaneous | Leave a comment

Walk-Ons: Making it through the December Lull

Together, we are helping each other come through the arid December lull dividing the lush jungles of November and the cool waters of January. Today we’re talking about the recruitment of Andrew Wiggins, the sexy-ness of the word co-ed, whether we made the right decision podcasting instead of becoming start basketball players, and, of course, Matt’s romantic history with a WWE diva. We also count down the top ten games of the weekend and discuss which of the top teams have the most “upside” as we march toward March. It’s a feel-good episode. In the advent calendar of the Walk-Ons, this episode is the caramel chocolate.

 

Got a great Psycho T story or a Bleacher Report quote or any other thoughts? E-mail us at [email protected]

Follow us on twitter at @WalkOnsPodcast

Or leave a voicemail at our Google Voice #, and you will almost surely get to be on the show: 818-Walk-On1 (that’s 818-925-5661)

Be a pal and subscribe to the podcast in iTunes. Just click “view in iTunes” once you reach that link, and then ‘subscribe for free.’ Voila. If you’re feeling really generous, you could also rate the podcast and write a positive review.

You can also access our podcast RSS feed.

If you need to download the file directly, this’ll do it. Enjoy!

Posted in Miscellaneous | 1 Comment

Eight Only Mostly Baseless Predictions for the Rest of the 2012 UNC Basketball Season

A month is just enough time for me to begin disguising non-empirical and kneejerk opinions as thoughtful observations, so here goes…

1. James Michael McAdoo will play great basketball all year, but because of who his is and where he plays and when he plays there this will be a great disappointment to everyone.

J.M.M. entered this season as the latest Tar Heel to have unreasonable expectations thrust upon him, which thrusting we were somehow all ok with even after what happened with our expectations re: Harrison Barnes.

We justified it thusly: 1. We had seen McAdoo play actual college basketball

2. We do not learn from our mistakes.

This year, McAdoo has looked dominant at times, serviceable at others (he accomplished periods of both looks against Indiana, in addition to a third, “like his hands had been frozen in Carbonite,” which better never show up again), averaging out to great, but never inhumanly good, which is what we all felt like we were justified in expecting. I am not blameless in this, either: I have found myself more than once wondering if he had the flu while he cruised to a double-double right in front of me.

McAdoo will be one of the many, many great basketball players to not be the national player of the year, but because he won’t have played like one of the Monstars from “Space Jam,” entitled UNC fans like myself will still look back and think about what might (could, should) have been.

2. James Michael McAdoo will play at an outrageously high level during the ACC and NCAA tournaments and will move on to the NBA.

We’ll call this an inverse-Barnes, who melted during last year’s NCAA tournament, but went pro anyway before anyone could realize that this was an indication of what his game is like without an elite point guard there creating his shots for him, rather than a fluke.

I have nothing to base this on besides his excellent play in the same circumstances last year, but I predict that J.M.M. will erupt in late April/early March. With the emergence of Joel James and Brice James as forces in the frontcourt, and next year’s arrival of soft-handed big man/snuggle bear Kennedy Meeks, he’ll declare for the draft this year rather than let a smaller role diminish his draft stock.

3. P.J. Hairston will not become J.J. Redick, but will be the most beloved Tar Heel at the end of the year.

J.J. was the dominant villain during my formative years as a Tar Heel fan, so my memories of him and the statistics of his actual performance might not match up. In my mind, he shot like 94% from beyond the arc, and would, rather than run the court after playing defense (“playing defense”), blink briefly out of reality and only reappear when a pass was thrown to the spot of the court where he was destined to make his next shot from. Whatever the numbers actually were, he was exactly 100% at shooting cold knives into my heart, and I’ve been waiting and waiting on a Carolina player to duplicate his exact skill set.

After a year and a month of saying “when a few more of these shots start falling, Peaches (my nickname for Hairston, it will catch on if we let it) is going to be a terror,” I’m realizing that he might not be that player. That said, Peaches has done at least one unquantifiable and awesome thing in every outing (the halftime buzzer beater, a play against UAB where he straight bossed a fellow around near half-court to receive a pass, he seems also to be legitimately interested in playing defense), and there’s no indication that this behavior will stop.

He’s also had some fantastic plays driving to the basket, and is becoming this team’s emotional epicenter. He is developing himself into a complete player, not simply an oft-errant sniper. It’s really exciting and I expect Peaches to be eliciting the loudest Dean Dome cheers by the end of the year. Sadly, though, it won’t be because he’s draining threes at a rate and frequency that justify introducing him over Garbage’s “Only Happy When it Rains.”

4. P.J. Hairston and J.P. Tokoto will sadly not establish a sufficient enough relationship to justify my “PJJP Palindrome Parejas” nickname that I really wanted to bust out.

Just something I’d been looking forward to all summer, not a big deal.

5. Brice Johnson will be the ACC Rookie of the year, or if not, there will be a legitimate case to be made that he deserves it.

The glut of young, unproven talent in Chapel Hill this year is Johnson’s biggest obstacle here. On a shallower team he’d be getting more minutes, and we’d all be speaking about him in hushed tones, silently working out what we’d be willing to give up to the Lord in a bargain that would keep him in powder blue for the next three years.

Once every game he does something so brilliant that all the colors in the world get brighter all of a sudden. His .630 is the highest field goal percentage for players averaging at least 14 minutes per game, and he’s got a higher average PPG than Dexter Strickland, who has the benefit of an average of ten more minutes per game. Granted, a lot of Dexter’s time is coming at point guard, a position not known for lighting up the scoreboard in Daggum Roy’s system, but still. He’s also becoming Marcus Paige’s favorite dish target when they’re in at the same time.

By the end of this season we will have stopped thinking of Johnson as a hyper-talented freshman and will begin to think of him as the future of Carolina basketball. Dovetailing with this…

6. Brice Johnson will begin next season with unreasonable expectations thrust upon him, and the grand cycle of hubris and entitlement will continue unbroken

Obviously.

7. UNC will win a game they have no business winning because of their outside shooting.

I have a friend who is excellent at reverse-jinxing Duke to greatness. His favorite thing to say about last year’s Duke team was that he had little confidence in them since they could win or lose any game they played, because they relied so much on outside shooting, and then I was in his kitchen, cursing his name and his family and smashing my head against his wall trying to concuss myself after Austin Rivers’ shot while he giggled or something, or was high-fiving Satan in the corner, or whatever it is Duke fans do to celebrate making the world a worse place.

I feel essentially the same way about the UNC this year, and say it as often as I can, which I guess makes me a hypocrite.

Leading candidates for this are against this year’s thoroughly terrifying Duke team at Cameron, and a game against a higher seed in the NCAA tournament. Unfortunately, this is a coin that inevitably flips both ways, so…

8. UNC will lose a game they have no business losing because of their outside shooting.

I don’t want to talk about it now, and I won’t want to talk about it then, but it will happen, and probably it will be Clemson, because that would be the absolute worst.

Posted in UNC | Tagged , | 4 Comments